Case · Netherlands · 2024

About 70% more spend in five months, with ROAS on the 150% target.

From May 2024 we managed the Google Ads account of this Dutch insurance comparison site, where consumers and business owners compare and take out insurance online. The goal from onboarding: ROAS campaigns at 150% or higher on average, ideally towards 200%, without too large a drop in conversions. Within that limit, we scaled up. From May through September 2024 we spent €141K, €58K more than in the five months before. That brought in 5.76K conversions (1.56K more) and 212K in conversion value (83.5K more). Value per euro of spend went from 1.54 to 1.50, so returns stayed on target while spend rose by about 70%.

Spend vs. prior 5 months
≈ +70%
Conversion value
≈ +65%
Value / cost
1.50
Google Ads Overview for the insurance account, May 1 to Sep 30, 2024, compared with Nov 30, 2023 to Apr 30, 2024: 5.76K conversions (↑1.56K), €141K cost (↑€58K), 212K conversion value (↑83.5K), value/cost 1.50 (↓0.04).
Google Ads Overview for the insurance account, May 1 to Sep 30, 2024, compared with Nov 30, 2023 to Apr 30, 2024: 5.76K conversions (↑1.56K), €141K cost (↑€58K), 212K conversion value (↑83.5K), value/cost 1.50 (↓0.04).

The window of this screenshot falls inside our period: we started in May 2024, so the figures at the top are from our management. The dotted lines are the comparison period. That period belonged to the previous manager and covers a different season, winter and spring versus summer, and season matters for scooter, motorcycle and caravan insurance. Part of the growth may therefore be seasonal. Spend still went up by about 70%, and value per euro stayed at 1.50. Conversion value here is the value the client sent back to Google Ads per conversion.

What we did

01 · One campaign per insurance type

Onboarding showed that campaigns per insurance type worked best, so that structure stayed. Each product had its own Search campaign with its own daily budget: car, business car, scooter, moped, motorcycle, microcar, caravan, pet, bicycle, home, courier insurance and insurance bundles.

02 · tCPA or tROAS, depending on the product

Each campaign had its own bid strategy. Car, business car, courier, pet and home ran on a target CPA. Scooter, motorcycle, microcar, caravan, bicycle and the bundles ran on a target ROAS, each with its own target, from 59% for bicycle to 225% for the bundles. Keywords with low ROAS over the last 60 days got a label, so we could track them separately.

According to the client, Performance Max did not work for this account. All Performance Max campaigns are paused.

03 · Testing alongside the live campaigns

Experiments ran alongside the existing campaigns: tCPA versus tROAS for bicycle and pet insurance, broad match keywords for car insurance, and R-ETAs versus RSAs for motorcycle insurance.

By the numbers

From May through September 2024, compared with the five months before: €58K more spend (about +70%), 1.56K more conversions (about +37%) and 83.5K more conversion value (about +65%). Value per euro of spend dropped by 0.04, from 1.54 to 1.50.

Cost
€141K
↑€58K · ≈ +70%
Conversions
5.76K
↑1.56K · ≈ +37%
Conversion value
212K
↑83.5K · ≈ +65%
Value / cost
1.50
Was 1.54 · target ≥ 1.50
Nov 30, 2023 to Apr 30, 2024 · previous manager · value/cost 1.54
May 1 to Sep 30, 2024 · value/cost 1.50, on about 70% more spend
≈ +70% spend · returns on target

The percentages are derived from the tiles: the prior period was €83K cost, 4.20K conversions and 128.5K conversion value. The comparison period covers a different season.

Boring, predictable, attributable. That’s what good PPC looks like.

Every engagement starts with a 30-minute audit: free, no slides, just a screen-share through your account.

Book the audit →